7 comments on “Debates for the New Millennium

  1. “For the authentic revolutionary conservative, what really counts is to be faithful not to past forms and institutions, but rather to principles of which such forms and institutions have been particular expressions, adequate for a specific period of time and in a specific geographical area.”

    ― Julius Evola, Men Among the Ruins: Post-War Reflections of a Radical Traditionalist

    The idea is that while our principles remain the same the forms and expressions it takes must change. Living things are not static only the dead. And that’s why conservatism fails because its not a living tradition but a dead one.

  2. Not everyone is plugged in and turned on. For them, the internet really hasn’t changed much.

    There’s nothing unique about our time and place. This has happened many times before. Humanity will survive this, as it survived the same things during Rome, Spain, England, etc.

    • Ryu, this article was written by a new writer for IoS. You approve or not? I think it’s pretty good. Also, if you wanna be a critic, maybe you should start writing for me?

      • Ha; I accept your challenge. If I write for you, my first article is on the white traitors in the military and police force.

        I will show how the primary failure of WN in the USA is caused by white soldiers and cops, who defend our enemy. There is no way that a colored, third world army and police could keep us down.

        I approve of this article, but I myself use modern technology very little. And the more I learn about the Murkan police state, the less incline I am to use it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *